0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡¸Å³ëÀÎÀÇ ÅëÁõ»çÁ¤À» À§ÇÑ Çѱ¹¾îÆÇ PACSLACÀÇ ½Å·Úµµ, Ÿ´çµµ ¹× À¯¿ë¼º Æò°¡

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2014³â 44±Ç 4È£ p.398 ~ 406
KMID : 0806120140440040398
±èÀº°æ ( Kim Eun-Kyung ) - ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

±è¼¼¿µ ( Kim Se-Young ) - ±¹¸³Ã¢¿ø´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
¾ö¹Ì¶õ ( Eom Mi-Ran ) - ±¹¸³¸ñÆ÷´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
±èÇö¼÷ ( Kim Hyun-Sook ) - À»Áö´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
ÀÌÀºÇ¥ ( Lee Eun-Pyo ) - À»Áö´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇаú

Abstract

Purpose: This study was done to develop and test the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC-K) in assessing pain of elders with dementia living in long-term care facilities.

Methods: The PACSLAC-K was developed through forward-backward translation techniques. Survey data were collected from 307 elders with dementia living in 5 long-term care facilities in Korea. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, Spearman¡¯s rho, paired t-test, ROC (receiver operation characteristic) curve with the SPSS/WIN (20.0) program.

Results: The PACSLAC-K showed high internal consistency (.90), inter-rater reliability (.86), intra-rater reliability (.93), and high concurrent validity (.74) in paired t-test with PAINAD. Discriminant validity also showed a significant difference compared with no pain. The PACSLAC-K showed a sensitivity of .93, specificity of .88, and Area Under the Curve of .95 in the ROC curve.

Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate that PACSLAC-K is useful in assessing pain for elders with dementia living in long-term care facilities.
KeyWords

Pain, Dementia, Elders, Validity, Reliability
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
SCI(E) MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed